Net time saved
A small experiment in honest measurement
After the demo.
The first draft is only part of the work.
Did AI actually save you time?
Your evidence, at a glance
The workbench
Quality pass rate
Total tool cost USD
No observations yet. Start with one task you can measure both ways.
Record a trial
Same task. Same scope. Same quality bar.
Where the minutes went
A fair comparison includes the invisible work.
- Prompting
- Waiting
- Review
- Rework
What is that time worth?
Optional lensPut a value on the time you measured. No annualized promises.
Add a trial and an hourly value to see this estimate.
Break-even is shown only when measured time saved is positive.
Repeated work reveals the pattern
Trial log 00
No grand claims. Just your first trial.
Record a task above, then try it again. Small samples are observations, not conclusions.
A little rigor goes a long way
Measure the finish.
Not the first draft.
Baseline − (prompting + waiting + review + rework)
= net time saved
- Define “done” first. Use equivalent scope and the same quality check for the baseline and assisted attempt. Choose a narrow, repeatable task.
- Log the full attempt. Count each minute once. Include failed attempts and their cost. A negative result means AI took longer.
- Keep quality beside speed. Net time saved includes every attempt, even quality failures. A faster failed result is not a usable deliverable.
- Repeat before you generalize. Learning, task difficulty, and order affect results. Try multiple comparable tasks and alternate methods. This log is descriptive, not a causal study or a forecast.
How the optional value estimate works
Estimated value = (net minutes saved ÷ 60 × your hourly value) − tool cost. Break-even hourly value = tool cost ÷ hours saved, available only when hours saved are positive. Neither calculation adjusts for output quality, unpaid work, opportunity cost, or whether you can actually use the saved time. Both apply only to the trials recorded here.